Federal High Court Abuja Urges CBN To Implement $53 Garnishee Order


The Federal High Court Abuja has again ordered the governor of Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) Mr. Emefiele to appear before it over an unpaid $53 million garnishee order in favour of Mr. Joe Agi, SAN and a team of lawyers.

The order was made by Justice I. E. Ekwo of the Federal High Court, Abuja. It would be recalled that he had earlier on November 20, 2019 under form 15 issued the judgment summons to Emefiele in a case with suit NO: FHC/ABJ/CS/1193/2017 instituted against CBN as Garnishee/Respondent, Linas International Limited and the Minister of Finance as Judgment Debtors Garnishees by Mr. Joe Agi Judgement as Creditor/Applicant and on behalf of a team of benefiting lawyers.

This judgement summon said “the plaintiff/judgment creditor obtained Garnishee Order Absolute against the Central Bank of Nigeria in this matter on the 5th day of July 2019, for the sum of $70,000,000.00 (Seventy Million US Dollars) and the same sum remains partially unsatisfied till date to the tune of $53 million”.

Documents made available to some newsmen in Calabar yesterday by sources close to the court said, when the matter came up for hearing on January 23, Emefiele was not in court and upon hearing from Mr. J. C. Njikonye, counsel to Agi, that Emefiele the garnishee respondent was “served the judgement summon but is not in court and not represented, Justice Ekwo made a fresh order saying, “an order is hereby made adjourning this case to enable Mr. Godwin Emefiele (Governor, Central Bank of Nigeria) appear in Court as stated on the Summons and answer to the issue thereto on the next date of hearing” which is February 26.

The court further agreed that “either party desires to postpone the hearing he must apply to the Count as soon as possible for that purpose and if the application is based on any matter of fact, he must be prepared to give proof of those decisions

“The parties are warded that at the hearing they are required to bring forward all the evidence by witnesses or by documents which each of them? Desires to rely on in support of his own case and in contradiction of that of his opponent. The proof will be required at the hearing, and not on a subsequent day. and parties failing to bring their evidence forward at the proper time may find themselves absolutely precluded from abducting it at all, or at best only allowed to do so on payment of substantial costs to the other side, and on such other terms as the Court thinks fir to impose”.

Justice Ekwo said, “parties desirous to enforce the attendance of witnesses should apply at once to the Court to issue one or more summonses for the attendance of the witnesses required. It is indispensable that the application should be made so as to allow time for reasonable notice to the witnesses required. If the witness is required to bring books or papers, they must be particularised in the summons sufficiently to enable him to understand what is meant.

“Any party summoning a witness through the Court, thereby becomes liable to pay such witness reasonable sum of money to be fixed by the Court for his expense and loss of time. The Count may refuse to enforce the attendance of a witness unless such sum has been fixed and deposited in the Court.

“If either party desires to use in evidence tat the hearing any book or document in the possession or power of the other party, he must give the other party reasonable notice in writing to produce it at the hearing, failing which he will not be allowed to give any secondary evidence of its contents.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *